There's a lot of talk about vaccines lately, more then previous years, thanks to our new friend, H1N1. Are you getting the vaccine? Personally, for now, I'll pass. I'm healthy and don't believe in vaccines for the healthy. Not to mention, the amount of mercury in this vaccine strain isn't something I want in my body. You can sugarcoat it all you want and tell me it's only a trace of it used (which btw, was proven to be much more then a trace because it's an 'emergency' ) but poison remains poison. However, I don't judge anyone who got the vaccine.

It was your choice.
THAT BEING SAID! What I wanted to share wasn't about the H1N1 vaccine (or is it?) but a rather interesting article I found while trying to inform myself on the vaccine. Reading this, you think this is like a Hollywood movie script: pharmaceutical companies spreading biological weapons to the population in order to test it. Sounds familar? It should... but the sad reality is... it IS a reality. Being skeptical at first, I made a quick research on both pharmaceutical companies in the article below, Baxter and Bayer Corporation... and sadly, you'll find the same thing I did.
[link]Scary isn't it? Makes me think twice about letting anyone inject me with anything... I'm not saying I won't get the vaccine eventually, but with today's media, it's hard to conceal much, especially when the population is involved.
Anyways... I still thought it was an interesting read and thought I'd share.
Trailer 1 Lost In The Snow:
[link]Trailer 2 Where's Sheryl:
[link]First Look Walthrough:
[link] Latest Interview with Silent Hill Heaven:
[link]Latest footage by G4TV:
[link]Enjoy!
That being said, they offer the vaccine without it now, which is very good news.
They banned Thiomersal from most vaccines 10 years ago... but they very specifically said "Thiomersal", not mercury in general. So we will see a similar poison under a different name with a different composition... except that it will still have mercury as the active ingredient.
I don't think it's meant to poison us, but maybe they haven't found something better - well no, they have since it's been removed.
I'm just glad you can have it without would you choose not to want it. At least for now.
I DID get the Australian release of the cervical cancer injections though, (APPARENTLY it's meant to lower the risk of getting cervical cancer) it was a set of three injections over six months. But I had to sign all these government papers saying I got it, my name, contact details, medicare number... Why!? The doctors were really pushing hard to get everyone to do it too. The lady who jabbed me was acting like a salesman. I find it hard to believe surgeries didnt get government kickbacks from the number of shots they pushed onto poor unsuspecting women. That really made me feel dubious towards it.
It's funny... I was completely against the vaccine, which is clearly indicated in this journal. I wrote this on the 27th... and on the 28th in the evening, I found out I was pregnant again. lol Now I was extremely conflicted. Do I get it? Should I get it? Maybe not?
I got to see my family doctor last night (not for the pregnancy but a lung infection - great timing, huh?
But it's up to you and what you think your chances are of getting it where you live, the flu is never good while pregnant anyway. But you might get the N1H1 vaccine, and then fall to a completely different strand of flu, and there are hundreds of those. The best immunity is a naturally built one in my opinion.
But I understand your predicament. I'll be facing these same decisions in another year or two.