deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
more ▶

Featured in Groups:

Details

October 27, 2009
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 38
Favourites: 0
Views: 107 (0 today)
[x]

Pharmaceutical Companies Conspiracies A Reality?

Journal Entry: Tue Oct 27, 2009, 6:18 PM
  • Mood: Horror
  • Listening to: BSG's The Plan Ending Song
  • Playing: Dot Hack G.U.
:iconturretplz::iconturretseesyouplz::iconturretseesplz::iconcompanioncube::iconturretsees2plz::iconturretseesyouplz::iconturret2plz:


Biological Weapons Created by Pharmaceutical Companies In Order to Experiment On Us?


There's a lot of talk about vaccines lately, more then previous years, thanks to our new friend, H1N1. Are you getting the vaccine? Personally, for now, I'll pass. I'm healthy and don't believe in vaccines for the healthy. Not to mention, the amount of mercury in this vaccine strain isn't something I want in my body. You can sugarcoat it all you want and tell me it's only a trace of it used (which btw, was proven to be much more then a trace because it's an 'emergency' ) but poison remains poison. However, I don't judge anyone who got the vaccine. :) It was your choice.

THAT BEING SAID! What I wanted to share wasn't about the H1N1 vaccine (or is it?) but a rather interesting article I found while trying to inform myself on the vaccine. Reading this, you think this is like a Hollywood movie script: pharmaceutical companies spreading biological weapons to the population in order to test it. Sounds familar? It should... but the sad reality is... it IS a reality. Being skeptical at first, I made a quick research on both pharmaceutical companies in the article below, Baxter and Bayer Corporation... and sadly, you'll find the same thing I did.

[link]

Scary isn't it? Makes me think twice about letting anyone inject me with anything... I'm not saying I won't get the vaccine eventually, but with today's media, it's hard to conceal much, especially when the population is involved.

Anyways... I still thought it was an interesting read and thought I'd share.




Silent Hill: Shattered Memories News


Trailer 1 Lost In The Snow: [link]
Trailer 2 Where's Sheryl: [link]
First Look Walthrough: [link]
Latest Interview with Silent Hill Heaven: [link]
Latest footage by G4TV: [link]

Enjoy!



Weekly Feature
This week's feature is... *drumroll*... :iconvachuu: valerie-haru</b>!



Latest Features
:icontimorodriguez: :iconharakimi: :icondrowdragon: :icondayanelohim: :iconholocausticity: :iconmovingstill:


My Characters At The Hands of Other Artists!

Thank you everyone! I love you all! :D
:thumb121528834: :thumb45954341:




My Bestest Best Friend in the whole wide world!
:iconkidcatgemini:


Stamps!

:thumb81578355:




design by ^pica-ae | coding by `LineBirgitte
Add a Comment:
 
:iconshadowrx:
~shadowrx Nov 15, 2009  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Thiomersal (the preservative still used in flu & tetanus vaccines) is 49% mercury (by weight)... hardly a trace amount in my opinion. wiki - [link]
Reply
:iconmariasunderland:
*MariaSunderland Nov 15, 2009  Hobbyist Digital Artist
A trace amount is still an amount.

That being said, they offer the vaccine without it now, which is very good news. :)
Reply
:iconshadowrx:
~shadowrx Nov 15, 2009  Hobbyist Digital Artist
What I want to know is why did they use mercury in the first place... most heavy metals are toxic. If the purpose was to kill all microbes then why not use silver instead? Silver is anti-microbial but very safe for larger organisms. Unless the real purpose is to poison us with the mercury, I don`t see a reason to use it.

They banned Thiomersal from most vaccines 10 years ago... but they very specifically said "Thiomersal", not mercury in general. So we will see a similar poison under a different name with a different composition... except that it will still have mercury as the active ingredient. :(
Reply
:iconmariasunderland:
*MariaSunderland Nov 15, 2009  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Well they say that Tiomerosal is a component of mercury that isn't dangerous to the system... Well, so they say. I don't like that, as you said, it's a component that derives from a dangerous substance, and as you said, there has to be a reason why it was banned from many states a decade ago.

I don't think it's meant to poison us, but maybe they haven't found something better - well no, they have since it's been removed.

I'm just glad you can have it without would you choose not to want it. At least for now.
Reply
:iconshadowrx:
~shadowrx Nov 15, 2009  Hobbyist Digital Artist
We`ve known silver to be a non-toxic antimicrobial since the Civil War... so they have had a safer alternative, I think, they just didn`t want to use it. wiki-[link] "Silver ions and silver compounds show a toxic effect on some bacteria, viruses, algae and fungi, typical for heavy metals like lead or mercury, but without the high toxicity to humans that are normally associated with these other metals."
Reply
:iconacerix:
Everyone in my family was pressuring me to get it today, but I didn't. Cause there just isn't enough info too many empty questions and areas.
Reply
:iconmariasunderland:
*MariaSunderland Oct 30, 2009  Hobbyist Digital Artist
It's best to ask your family doctor first and you kinda have to dodge the question because otherwise they pretty much have to recommend it to you.
Reply
:iconkatt006:
LOL I haven't got the free vaccine for that same reason. I'm always a little sceptical of 'emergency release vaccines' because they have skipped the prolonged testing process, and when everyone grows a third eye or goes blind fifteen years down the track, who's laughing then?! XD It's just government fear-mongering.

I DID get the Australian release of the cervical cancer injections though, (APPARENTLY it's meant to lower the risk of getting cervical cancer) it was a set of three injections over six months. But I had to sign all these government papers saying I got it, my name, contact details, medicare number... Why!? The doctors were really pushing hard to get everyone to do it too. The lady who jabbed me was acting like a salesman. I find it hard to believe surgeries didn’t get government kickbacks from the number of shots they pushed onto poor unsuspecting women. That really made me feel dubious towards it.
Reply
:iconmariasunderland:
*MariaSunderland Nov 11, 2009  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Yeah it's a tough decision.

It's funny... I was completely against the vaccine, which is clearly indicated in this journal. I wrote this on the 27th... and on the 28th in the evening, I found out I was pregnant again. lol Now I was extremely conflicted. Do I get it? Should I get it? Maybe not?

I got to see my family doctor last night (not for the pregnancy but a lung infection - great timing, huh? :P ) and I'm aware she's someone who doesn't believe in vaccines... But when I asked her about it she immediately said that I SHOULD get it because of the pregnancy - without the adjuvants of course. So I guess that my anti-vaccine mind was turned around this time. I know how the news can be, but since I wasn't the only one afraid of the vaccine, a few documentaries made in my regions showed how the vaccine was made, what H1N1 was, etc... And it was very informative. I understand more about it now then I did, and in the end, it's less dangerous for me and the baby to get it then not to get it. :/
Reply
:iconkatt006:
Yeah it's a hard one. If I were in your shoes I'd have to say that I wouldn't get it. But N1H1 isn't really rife here. The news carries on about it though but cases are rare. (Fear-mongering like usual, a scared public buys more newspapers = fact.)

But it's up to you and what you think your chances are of getting it where you live, the flu is never good while pregnant anyway. But you might get the N1H1 vaccine, and then fall to a completely different strand of flu, and there are hundreds of those. The best immunity is a naturally built one in my opinion.

But I understand your predicament. I'll be facing these same decisions in another year or two. ^^;
Reply
Add a Comment: